Make your own free website on


QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 16
Agreement & Decree Comparison
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 18
Law 142 / Loi 142
Jean Charest's Report Card
The Heart of our Demand
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 1
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 2
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 3
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 4
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 5
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 6
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 7
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 8
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 9
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 10
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 11
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 12
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 13
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 14
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 15
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 16
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin October 26, 2005 Part One
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin October 26, 2005 Part Two
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin October 26, 2005 Part Three
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin October 26, 2005 Part Four
Mise à jour sur la négociation (section un)
Mise à jour sur la négociation (section deux)
Mise à jour sur la négociation (section trois)
Mise à jour sur la négociation (section quatre)
QPAT Negotiations Bulletin 17
Modified Action Plan
Plan d'action modifié
November 14 Voting Results
QESBA Press Release
New Name for Ministry of Education
Contact Us
Contact Claude Bachand
Contact Daniel Bouchard
Contact Claude Boucher
Contact Bernard Brodeur
Contact Jean Charest
Contact Jean-Marc Fournier
Contact Monique Gagnon-Tremblay
Contact Normand Jutras
Contact Pierre Paradis
Contact Pierre Reid
Contact Jean Rioux
Contact Yvon Vallieres
The Quebec Electoral Map


The Fight Continues

No Deal


As indicated in the last information bulletin, negotiations are presently on hold.  Settlement has not been reached.  Despite nearly two months of intensive talks from late August to mid-October, too little progress has been made.  The minimal requirements for an acceptable settlement were just not there.  The tables eventually broke on October 13th because the government refused to come through on a very limited number of issues … issues that are highly significant to us.


The main items yet to be resolved are:


Special Education

The government’s offer on article 8-9.00 is still vague at this point.  The clauses we have received at the English negotiating table are unworkable in their present form.


  • They do NOT outline the triggering mechanism for services.
  • They do NOT provide for a clear and simple form to initiate the demand for the services.
  • They do NOT make clear the powers of the special services committee at the school level.
  • They do NOT make clear the powers or process of the school board parity committee on special needs.
  • They do NOT mandate a provincial committee to effectively monitor the process.
  • They do NOT clarify how a portrait of the school boards’ existing spending on special needs (Year Zero) will be obtained and verified by the local unions.
  • Finally, they do make clear that only the process, vague as it is presently, will be arbitral. This means that the content of unpalatable decisions will not be subject to grievance unless they violate the as yet unclear process.

We have managed to retain coding for students in these important areas: physically and intellectually handicapped, behavioral and severe behavioral difficulties.


A new special education model, which is essentially a “hybrid” of the old and the new, may well be workable and present a practical solution to some of the many problems teachers are now experiencing if the following conditions are met:


  • financing is adequate and guaranteed;
  • the procedures are well defined and workable;
  • the definitions of special needs students are well defined;
  • a clear triggering mechanism and a simple form are provided;
  • teachers and unions are granted a decisional role in the process;
  • a verifiable mechanism for ensuring services follow students from year to year is provided.

Mobility of Teachers on Availability

The government is still insisting on the right to transfer teachers up to hundreds of kilometers beyond the current 50 km limit.


Temporary Assignment

An absolute requirement of the government’s offer is that teachers on temporary disability leave be subject, when unable to teach but otherwise employable, to temporary transfers within the school or board. This not only breaches our disability insurance regulations but could also lead to conflict with the unions of other school board staff.



The salary offer remains at a mere 8% over a six year nine month period. The first two years of the contract would be at ZERO %.  We expect at least the cost of living to be covered and are asking for a reasonable 12.5% over the six year period.





The QPAT negotiating team, Executive and Board of Directors, unanimously recommend rejection of the entire government offer. An unequivocal message to the government is essential at this critical time.

The ATA Supports Quality Public Education
in the Eastern Townships